Short answer
Use Zapier to route intake data → look up a client’s style-profile → call ChatGPT (via Zapier or OpenAI API) with a templated prompt that returns both a human brief and a machine-readable version, then store both plus an audit record in Airtable/Sheets/Drive for versioning.

Why this works
Zapier handles triggers, lookups, branching (Paths), and retries with minimal code. ChatGPT produces the humanized brief and enforces client-specific style rules when you feed it a per-client prompt profile. Storing outputs in a structured DB gives you versioning and audit logs.

Recommended architecture (high level)
- Trigger: Google Form / Typeform / Airtable form submission in Zapier.
- Lookup: Zapier searches an Airtable/Sheet table that stores client profiles: tone, forbidden words, legal clauses, approved templates, preferred deliverable length.
- Branching: Use Zapier Paths if you need different workflows per client type (enterprise vs SMB) or different deliverables.
- Generate: Zapier action to call ChatGPT/OpenAI. Send a system+user prompt built from a template + the client profile + intake answers. Ask for 2 outputs: JSON brief (fields: objective, audience, deliverables, key messaging points, CTA, constraints, revisionNotes) and a human-ready summary.
- Store: Upsert the JSON + human brief + metadata (timestamp, Zap run id, who triggered) into Airtable (or Google Sheets). Increment a version field and keep a full history table.
- Notify: Post to Slack/email the account team with the brief link and a quick-approve button that creates a new Zap run for “client-approved” status.

Templates & multi-client prompt switching (practical)
- Create one prompt skeleton: start with SYSTEM instructions (enforce style rules, max length, banned words). Then insert client_profile text (pulled from Airtable). Then include intake answers. End with "Output JSON with keys X, Y, Z and after that a concise human summary."
- Use a single Zap with a Lookup step (client_id → profile). If profile not found, fallback to a generic style.

Versioning & audit logs
- Use Airtable: table A = briefs (current), table B = brief_versions (append full outputs each run). On upsert to table A, also create a new record in table B; include Zap run id, user id, and approval status.
- Keep the full prompt + model response in the version table for audit.
- Enable Zapier’s run history and optionally push logs to an S3 bucket or dedicated logging table if compliance requires immutable storage.

Decision criteria (pick approach by)
- Budget: Zapier task-heavy; Airtable costs for large history. If budget tight, use Google Sheets + batched cleanup.
- Skill level: No-code teams can implement via Zapier + Airtable. Dev teams can build more robust webhooks and use the OpenAI API directly.
- Team size & SLA: Larger teams benefit from structured approvals and Slack notifications.
- Output quality: If you need very high fidelity briefs, add few-shot examples in prompts and use a higher-tier model.

Recommendation
Start with Zapier + Airtable + ChatGPT integration for an MVP. Iterate prompts and add Paths for client groups. Move to API-backed service later if you need lower latency, richer logging, or cost optimization.

Practical checklist
1) Create client_profiles table (tone, banned words, template snippets, contacts).
2) Build intake form and Zap trigger. 3) Add Lookup step to populate profile. 4) Build prompt template, include JSON output spec. 5) Call ChatGPT/OpenAI via Zapier. 6) Save response to briefs and version table. 7) Notify team with brief link and approval button. 8) Log Zap run id and prompt for audits. 9) Test with 10 clients and iterate prompts.

Best-for / Avoid-if
- Best for: agencies wanting quick no-code rollout, multi-client switching, and audit trails.
- Avoid if: you need on-prem data-only processing or extremely high throughput/cost optimization — consider a developer-built API solution instead.

Tools mentioned: Zapier, ChatGPT

Compare Zapier and Make